I think a single message cannot possibly encapsulate the essence of a relationship, particularly a dynamic one. The question I have is: Will it be separate? Will the need to have the conversation be much deeper than the chasm of separation?Īnd because the relationship will evolve, so, too, will the message on the ring. Or an arm, in this case, because this relationship will be much deeper. So, a similar example might be the kind of apprehension one feels leaving the house without the cellphone. They might see no reason to do so, or even view it as an infringement of their right to connectivity and information assimilation.
Ubiquitous computing and the outright utility of having someone to talk to that can learn to be an ultimate friend, becoming, essentially, an extension of your own self means an individual will not easily separate from it.
I understand this is necessary for the story to make its point but would it really happen? The other is the ring with only that saying. There are a number of assumptions, such as there being a distance between Greta and Steve.
This is a curious story, if it is a bit on the traditional side.
0 kommentar(er)
